Discuss the circumstances under which the inductive approach to writing a bad-news message can be disregarded
Normally, a writer's purpose is to convey a clear message and retain the recipient's goodwill; thus, the inductive outline is appropriate. In the rare circumstances in which a choice must be made between clarity and goodwill, clarity is the better choice. When the deductive approach will serve a communicator's purpose better, it should be used.
Placing a refusal in the first sentence can be justified when one or more of the following circumstances exist:
a . The message is the second response to a repeated request.
b. A very small, insignificant matter is involved.
c. The request is obviously ridiculous, immoral, unethical, illegal, or dangerous.
d. The sender's intent is to "shake" the receiver.
e. The sender–recipient relationship is so close and longstanding that satisfactory human relations can be taken for granted.
f. The sender wants to demonstrate authority.
You might also like to view...
M1 money multiplier equals
A. (transaction accounts + currency) ÷ monetary base B. (transaction accounts - currency) ÷ monetary base C. (transaction accounts + currency) × monetary base D. (transaction accounts - currency) × monetary base
When firms issue common stock for assets other than cash, the firm records the shares exchanged for noncash assets at the fair value of the shares given or, if the firm cannot make a reasonable estimate, at the fair value of the assets received
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Rachel Retailer sends a preprinted purchase order offering to buy goods from Snidley Supplier. Snidley acknowledges Rachel's offer with a preprinted acceptance form. The terms of the two forms do not mirror each other. To analyze whether an enforceable contract exists, one must first determine whether the new language in the acceptance is an additional term or a different term
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Given the information in the text, why is public policy towards whistleblowing an inconsistent issue?