Which of these would be considered a reason in opposition to Texas having more publicly funded campaigns?
a. State support of candidates would free them of dependence on special interests
b. Citizens would be forced to subsidize candidates whose views many citizens would strongly disagree with.
c. States would have the autonomy to devise a means of ensuring that participation in the system remained voluntary.
d. Allowing some fringe groups an opportunity to express their extremist views is good for democracy.
e. All of these are reasons in opposition to more publicly funded campaigns.
b
You might also like to view...
A brief is a written statement by an attorney that summarizes a case and the laws and rulings that support it.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The Basic Law created a unitary system of government for Germany
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
_________ provide(s) the incumbent with an advantage.
a. term limits b. scandals c. greater visibility d. presidential coattails
How is a Super PAC different from a PAC?
a. PACs operate on the state level, while Super PACs are involved in politics on a national scale. b. Unlike PACs, Super PACs are allowed to endorse candidates. c. Super PACs are formed when two or more PACs join together to raise funds for a particular candidate. d. Unlike PACs, Super PACs may accept donations of any size.