Why did the Reagan administration cut funding for oil conservation in the 1980s? How did this decision impact today’s conservation efforts?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should identify how the Reagan administration opted to cut funding for oil conservation in the 1980s following a decline in fuel prices. Answers should also identify how skepticism over the need for conservation, driven by this decline as well as more recent phenomena such as fracking, have led many to believe that conservation is unnecessary.
You might also like to view...
Uncontrollable spending increased from 1962 to 2012
Answer:
In Ratner's view, why is coordinated action on the implementation of international law now "more feasible than in the past"?
a. The Cold War has ended. b. There is now an international criminal court to handle cases of international law. c. States now recognize that without international law, the system is dangerously anarchic. d. The principles of international law are now more widely accepted by the international community. e. As the only superpower in the system, the United States has the power to implement international law unilaterally.
James Madison defined ________ as statistical minorities who would organize around issues they felt strongly about.
A. political parties B. factions C. protestors D. democracies
In Brown v. Board of Education (1955), the Supreme Court ordered desegregation of the Nation's public schools
a. "at once.". b. "with all deliberate speed.". c. "as soon as possible.". d. "with due dispatch.".