Jerry is interested in purchasing a washing machine. The price of the machine is $500. The probability that the machine will break down is 20% every year
If the machine breaks down in the first year and Jerry holds a warranty, he receives a new washing machine worth $400 that year. If the machine breaks down after two years and he holds a warranty, he receives a new machine that is worth $300 after the second year. The price of a warranty for two years is $100. The market interest rate is 5%. Is buying the warranty a good investment for Jerry? Explain your answer. Show all the necessary calculations.
If the washing machine breaks down in the first year, Jerry will receive a new machine worth $400.
The present value of this machine is 400/1.05 = 381 approximately.
If the machine breaks down in the second year, Jerry gets a new machine worth $300.
The present value of such a machine is 300/(1.05 )2 = 272 approximately.
Hence the expected value of having the warranty is equal to
0.20 × (381 ) + 0.20 × (272 ) -100 = 76.20 + 54.4 -100 = $30.60.
In this case, since the expected value of an extended warranty is positive, it is a good investment for Jerry.
You might also like to view...
Research by Fogel and Engerman shows that, holding other factors constant, output per unit of total input was highest for Southern farms with:
a. no slaves. b. 1 to 15 slaves. c. 16 to 50 slaves. d. 50 or more slaves.
First National Bank has zero excess reserves. Ceteris paribus, if the required reserve ratio increases, which of the following will happen immediately?
A. The bank will not have enough required reserves. B. The bank will have excess reserves. C. Bank assets will increase. D. Total reserves will increase.
Suppose that Thierry and Abdul are duopolists. Thierry is producing 700 units of output, and Abdul is producing 500 units of output. When Abdul produces 500 units, Thierry maximizes profit by producing 700 units. When Thierry produces 700 units of output, Abdul maximizes profit by producing 500 units. Thierry and Abdul are
a. pricing at the minimum of marginal cost. b. in a competitive market. c. at a Nash equilibrium. d. engaging in mark-up pricing.
A crowding-in effect occurs
A. When an increase in government spending leads to an increase in savings. B. When increased government borrowing reduces the quantity of funds that businesses can borrow. C. That increases investment each time government spending increases. D. When the increase in GDP caused by the increased government spending makes businesses see more investment projects as profitable.