InIzell v. Union Carbide Corporation, the court held that?
A. ?both the compensatory damages and punitive damages awards were clearly excessive, considering that Mr. Izell was 85 at the time of the lawsuit.
B. ?it was improper for the jury to consider Union Carbide's net worth in deliberating on the punitive damages award.
C. ?the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict, as well as the compensatory damage award of $30 million and punitive damage award of $6 million, against Union Carbide.
D. ?the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, as well as the compensatory damage award of $30 million and punitive damage award of $6 million, against Union Carbide.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
Filing for a Chapter 13 bankruptcy has the same power that ________ has to invoke the powers and protection of the Automatic Stay
A) Chapter 11 B) Chapter 7 C) Chapter 6 D) Chapter 4
An administrative microsystem contains
a. a firm’s management style b. a firm’s culture c. a firm’s structure d. a and b only e. b and c only
The right embodied in the Fifth Amendment that allows an accused person to remain silent is the right _______________.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Attorney fees may be awarded to successful litigants under the:
a. FOIA b. Privacy Act c. FOIA and Privacy Act d. none of the above; attorney fees are not recoverable in information and privacy cases