Grant is a delivery person for Watkins Furniture. One day, after delivering a chair to Nadine's house, he stopped at a fast food restaurant to get a sandwich at the drive-through window. As he was leaving the parking lot, he accidentally hit the rear of
Blanche's car. Discuss the possible liability of Watkins for Grant's accident. Would there be any difference in the potential liability of Watkins if Grant had the accident after driving 30 miles away to visit a friend?
The major issue here is abandonment. Watkins is liable for the actions of its employee that occur while the employee is at work, but not for actions that occur after the employee has abandoned the principal's business. Here, the accident at the local restaurant would probably result in liability for Watkins because Grant would likely be considered to simply be on a detour from company business. If Grant had driven 30 miles away to visit a friend before having the accident, Watkins would probably not be liable. Grant would probably be considered to be "off on a frolic of his own" and therefore not acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is/are not true regarding a manufacturing firm?
a. A manufacturing firm incurs costs as it produces goods by changing the physical form of raw materials. b. The product costs for a manufacturing firm are the costs incurred in manufacturing goods for sale. c. The costs to produce finished goods inventory for a manufacturing firm do not become expenses until the firm sells the product. d. Prior to sale, the production costs of a a manufacturing firm represent the transformation of assets from one form into another. e. Product costs for a manufacturing firm are treated as period costs during the period that the inventory is finished and ready for sale.
If you are considering pursuing a career in project management, you can simply graduate from school and become a project manager.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Professor Jones accuses Rachel, a senior at a large state university, of cheating on an exam. The Professor claims that Rachel must prove to him that she did not cheat. If she fails to convince him, she will be expelled from college. Rachel is being denied her due process rights
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Company A wants to use some technology that Company B has developed, so Company A pays Company B a license fee, called a(n): A) permission fee
B) royalty. C) IPR. D) rights payment.