Describe the differences between epideictic rhetoric, deliberative rhetoric, and forensic rhetoric and give an example of each

Question

Please provide the best answer for the best statement.

Answer 1

Answer: Epideictic rhetoric is the type of rhetoric that reaffirms cultural values through praising and blaming. For example, after the devastating earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan in March 2011, some political commentators connected the events to Japan’s careful and meticulous recycling practices. By connecting this tragedy to environment practices, they attempted to advance their own criticism and view of recycling and other practices as misguided. Deliberative rhetoric is the type of rhetoric used to argue what courses of action a society should do in the future and is deeply embedded in the democratic process.For example, when legislators argue about raising taxes to pay for new roads or increasing funding for education, they are engaged in deliberative rhetoric. Forensic rhetoric is rhetoric that addresses events that happened in the past with the goal of setting things right after an injustice has occurred.Forensic rhetoric also shows how notions of justice have changed over time. For example, in 1692, people in Salem, Massachusetts, felt that justice was served when they hanged nineteen people and jailed hundreds more for practicing witchcraft. Today, we see those trials as examples of injustice.