The views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the area of individual rights have changed dramatically over time. Compare the views of the Warren Court to those of the Burger and Rehnquist Courts. Why do you think these courts had such divergent views? Which do you prefer and why? Support your opinions.
What will be an ideal response?
should include a comparison of the more liberal Warren Court to the significantly more conservative Burger and Rehnquist Courts.
You might also like to view...
Questioning persons who are intoxicated requires special caution
a. True b. False
Where a convicted defendant pursues an appellate remedy with a view to having a conviction reversed, the defendant-appellant:
A) understands that a retrial could cause a prosecutor to become vindictive because of the appeal. B) knows that he or she may be tried again on the same charge or lesser charge as the original conviction. C) must recognize that to appeal a conviction involves a risk that a new trial could result in a conviction for a more serious offense than the original verdict. D) generally waives any argument under the double jeopardy provision of the Fifth Amendment because the defendant is asking to be retried for the same or a lesser offense if the appellate court reverses the conviction. E) answers A and D are both correct responses.
A type of image that cannot be viewed directly is called a(n) ___________ image
a. Real b. Imaginary c. Reflected d. Virtual
The variable that explains or predicts the outcome variable is known as the:
a. elaboration variable b. conceptual variable c. independent variable d. dependent variable