Give a reason why a theory might be discarded
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: [key points to be made]
? Doesn’t fit evidence
? Can’t be tested in any meaningful way
? Isn’t popular, too ahead or behind its time
? Isn’t able to make sense out of conflicting evidence or positions
? Isn’t logically sound
You might also like to view...
In the case United States v. Walters (1993), the facts that lead to defendant Walters being charged with mail fraud were:
a. making college athletes professionals b. making universities pay scholarships for professionals c. threatening athletes who did not choose Walters as an agent d. all of the above
Police professionalism during the Reform Era was equated with ______.
a. technological advances and improved administration b. diminished corruption and increased hiring standards for officers c. increased diversity among the police force d. the use of standardized tests in the application process
The hart-rudman task force on homeland security took place during which president's administration?
A. George W. Bush B. Ronald Reagan C. Barack Obama D. Bill Clinton
In what year was the National Strategy updated from its original version?
A. 2004 B. 2012 C. 2007 D. 2008