Compare and contrast the intent necessary to commit a tort to the intent necessary to commit a crime
Criminal intent or mens rea usually requires subjective fault, which includes both the consequences a person desires to cause and those consequences he knows, or should know, are virtually certain to result from his conduct. Criminal intent without an overt act is not a crime. Some criminal statutes require a lesser degree of mental fault, which is called objective fault and involves a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe under the circumstances. Many regulatory criminal statutes have totally dispensed with the mental element of a crime. Intent, as used in tort law, does not require a hostile or evil motive. It means that the actor desires to cause the consequences of his act or that he believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from the act. Infants and incompetents are generally held liable for their intentional torts.
You might also like to view...
In the absence of an operating system, applications run slowly on a computer.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A leasehold is a payment
a. for the right to use certain property. b. for the right to sublease certain property. c. to give up or to get out of a lease. d. to improve leased property.
Operations management focuses on managing the production and delivery of an organization's products or services
A. more economically. B. by utilizing motion studies. C. with a more diverse workforce. D. more effectively. E. to more customers.
Organizational charts depict _____________________
a. an organization's overall worth b. the structure of an organization c. an organization's corporate history d. the mission of an organization