Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: the prosecution claims that my client, Jack Hill, caused
immense physical distress to the plaintiff, Jill Fletcher. But, surely, this is not possible. For
my client can barely walk, as he suffers from multiple sclerosis.
What will be an ideal response?
ANS:This
passage contains an argument. The issue is whether Jack Hill caused immense
physical distress to Jill Fletcher. The conclusion is that Jack Hill did not cause immense
physical distress to Jill Fletcher. The premise is that Jack Hill can barely walk.
This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that Jack Hill can
barely walk. The premise is that Jack Hill suffers from multiple sclerosis.
This argument is an inductive causal argument.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: the prosecution claims that ? my client, Jack Hill, caused
immense physical distress to the plaintiff, Jill Fletcher. But, surely, this is not possible. For ?
my client can barely walk, as ? he suffers from multiple sclerosis.
??
??
??
??
??
You might also like to view...
The notion that once an action is taken by an agent, it lives a life of its own that combines with different environmental conditions and the final result is beyond the agent's predictive abilities, is what concept?
a. Morin’s Ecology of Action c. Roboethics b. Gaia Theory d. Heterogenesis of Ends
Aristotle wrote about money
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Which feature of moral principles shares this trait with all normative discourse and is used to appraise behavior, assign praise and blame, and produce feelings of satisfaction or guilt?
What will be an ideal response?What will be an ideal response?
Identify the main connective and truth value for ~(F ? E) ? (~E v ~ F). Assume that E and F are both false
A) biconditional, true. B) biconditional, false. C) negation, true.