Discuss the significance of recent court rulings addressing the admissibility of DNA evidence in the courtroom
What will be an ideal response?
• Two standards have traditionally been used to govern the admission of scientific evidence: the relevancy test, which permits the admission of relevant evidence that is helpful to the trier of fact; and the Frye test, in which courts admit evidence based on novel scientific techniques only when the technique has gained general acceptance in the scientific community to which it belongs. Also, the Daubert test governs the admissibility of expert witness testimony, which must be both relevant and reliable in order to be admissible.
You might also like to view...
How is the use of computer technology by criminals and law enforcement similar too and different from the use of other types of technology to perpetrate crimes and bring perpetrators to justice?
What will be an ideal response?
The reaction of luminol with blood results in the production of _____ rather than _____
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
An administrative task for this person/group in the Supreme Court includes regulating attorney admissions to the Supreme Court bar.
A. chief justice B. Congress C. lawyer D. magistrate judge
Content analysis is really a _____________________ operation that represents the measurement process
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word