Explain the advantages and disadvantages of privatization using the voucher system of Cleveland and other methods of school choice as an example.
What will be an ideal response?
Privatization is intended to replace bureaucratic and political pressures with those of a competitive marketplace in influencing policy decision making and implementation. Students should discuss how school choice (and particularly the Cleveland voucher system) is an example of how some believe market pressures can influence the outcome of a policy decision. In the case of Cleveland, the proposal was to give $2,500 vouchers to each affected child so as to allow parents a choice in where to send their children to school. These vouchers were valid for public, private, and parochial (faith-based) schools. The intent was to force schools to become more competitive and creative in their approaches as well as to provide enticements for results-based outcomes (as measured by student performance, attendance, participation, test scores, etc.). But vouchers in and of themselves are not the only school choice solution. Some have addressed this problem through “schools of choice,” magnet schools, and charter schools. Of these, charter schools have become the most popular choice throughout the country. But however the policy is designed and implemented, the intent is to force competition, creativity, and improved student performance. Many argue that privatization is the one and only solution to the problem, and others have seen other methods of forcing competition and performance. This has culminated with the standards-based policy known as No Child Left Behind, which goes about influencing school performance through a “carrot-and-stick” method of reward and punishment. Seen as having too many unintended consequences, this has led to new proposals that are focused on allowing states to determine their own specific standards, measurements, and consequences.
You might also like to view...
At the Constitutional Convention, in exchange for a ban on export taxes, the South agreed to let Congress have the power to _____.
A. impose import taxes B. regulate voting rights C. appoint an independent executive D. ban slavery E. regulate interstate commerce
Who instituted the Marshall Plan and who benefited directly from it?
a. The Soviet Union instituted the Marshall Plan to benefit Eastern Europe. b. Germany instituted the Marshall Plan to benefit the United States. c. Italy instituted the Marshall Plan to benefit Western Europe. d. The United States instituted the Marshall Plan to benefit Eastern Europe.
The philosophies of political philosopher John Locke influenced the framers of the Constitution. Although he favored limited government, Locke also was a proponent of ________, which bestows discretionary executive powers upon the presidency
a. judicial authority b. prerogative power c. the personal presidency d. the articles of impeachment
Why principally would people decide not to act in the political process in the United States?
a. Political participation is frowned upon by political elites. b. There are a lack of media through which to act in this country. c. They think their political ideas would cause them to lose their job. d. They feel that action may not lead to real change.