¿Cómo son?Your roommate is describing the friends you have in common. Complete the sentences with the correct form of the adjective.?
Carmen y David son (inteligente) ________________________________________________.?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
inteligentes
You might also like to view...
The best-known decision affecting prejudicial press coverage of criminal cases is Sheppard v. Maxwell. In 1954, Dr. Samuel Sheppard of Cleveland was sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering his wife. His conviction followed reams of newspaper stories, many of which proclaimed his guilt before the jury had decided the case. The jurors, who went home each evening, were told by the judge not to
read newspapers or pay attention to broadcast reports, but no one monitored what the jurors did. Twelve years later, lawyer F. Lee Bailey took Sheppard's trial to the U.S. Supreme Court, where a conviction was overturned on the premise that Sheppard had been a victim of a biased jury. In writing the decision, Justice Tom C. Clark prescribed several remedies. He said that reporters should have been limited to certain areas in the courtroom, that the news media should not have been allowed to interview the witnesses, and that the court should have forbidden statements outside of the courtroom. The outcome of the Sheppard case led to many courtroom experiments with restrictions on the press. The most widespread practices were restraining (gag) orders and closed proceedings. With a gag order, the judge limited what the press could report. But since 1980, several court cases have overturned most of these limitations so that today the press is rarely excluded from courtroom proceedings, and the exclusion lasts only as long as it takes the news organization to appeal to a higher court for access. Cameras in the courtroom is a sticky issue between judges, who want to avoid the disruption that cameras present, and broadcast newspeople, who want to photograph what is going on. In selected cases, however, cameras have been allowed to record complete trials. In 1994, for example, Court TV broadcast the entire trial of O.J. Simpson. Cameras in the courtroom is a state-by-state decision. Some states allow cameras during civil but not criminal trials. Other states try to completely limit access. The U.S. courts and the press are not yet completely comfortable partners. The O.J. Simpson case was used as an example of a. a case in which the trial was broadcast on TV. b. a case in which a gag order was used. c. a case in which no murder weapon was found. d. a case involving a biased jury.
Unternehmen mit Büros in Dresden sind ...
a. MacDonalds und Burger King. b. Siemens und VW. c. Opel und Ford.
Culture. Répondez vrai ou faux.Boire de l'eau minérale est un exemple d'un geste écolo.
A. vrai B. faux
How do we know Dally felt at least partially responsible for Johnny's fate?
What will be an ideal response?