Which of the following are ways to challenge or attack a legal position or argument based on a statute?
A. The elements of the statute are not met
B. The key facts of the client's case and the facts required by the statute are not sufficiently similar
C. The statute is not sufficiently broad to allow an interpretation other than the one relied on
D. The case relied on to interpret the statute is on point
E. All of the above
F. a, b, and c
G. b and d
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Early forays into the realms of computer-assisted legal research, involving statutes and case law, were long, complicated journeys
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
__________, such as "all the rest, residue, and remainder," should be minimized in legal writing
a. Legalese b. Terminology c. Plain English d. Redundancies
Define "fictitious payee."
What will be an ideal response?
Who was not an author of the Federalist Papers?
A. George Washington B. Alexander Hamilton C. John Jay D. James Madison