What are the policy implications associated with labeling, conflict, feminist, and radical theories? What are the basic assumptions about crime and how would each policy address the crime problem? Are the policies pragmatic? Why or why not?

What will be an ideal response?


Labeling theory: rather than assuming that criminal behavior causes societal reaction, it posits that societal reaction causes criminal behavior.
Conflict theory: argues that stigmatizing shaming of offenders makes matters worse and increases crime. Such a process makes the offender an irredeemable outlaw, irreconcilable with the community. In a sense, the person is made into a permanent persona non grata and has little choice but to associate with similarly stigmatized persons. Braithwaite calls for “reintegrative shaming,” efforts to reintegrate the offender back into the community of respectables.
Feminist theory: Crime is examined as it is related to gender-based inequality. Criminology expresses an androcentric bias and excludes women from their analysis. Emphasizing various perspectives including Marxist, interactionist, and critical theory, feminist writers view dominant empirical positivism as failing to include gender as a central force, blind to its ideological bias, and ignoring females. Their view is that much nonfeminist research is sexist owing to cultural beliefs and to a preponderance of perspectives that assume traditional gender roles. This bias expressed itself in the past, particularly on topics such as rape and domestic violence.
Radical theory: the crime problem could be resolved only by the establishment of a socialist state. The U.S. society is based on an advanced capitalist economy.
The state is organized to serve the interests of the dominant economic class, the capitalist ruling class.
Criminal law is an instrument of the state and the ruling class to maintain and perpetuate the existing social and economic order.
Crime control in capitalist society is accomplished through a variety of institutions and agencies established and administered by a governmental elite, representing ruling class interests, for the purpose of establishing domestic order.
The contradictions of advanced capitalism, the disjunction between existence and essence, require that the subordinate classes remain oppressed by whatever means necessary, especially through the coercion and violence of the legal system.
Only with the collapse of capitalist society and the creation of a new society based on socialist principles will there be a solution to the crime problem.

Criminal Justice

You might also like to view...

The ______ the onset of behavior difficulties, the greater chance there is for adolescent delinquency.

A. earlier B. varied C. later D. more recent

Criminal Justice

In __________, the USSC held that, in assessing the racial neutrality of a prosecutor's peremptory challenge, the trial court was required to evaluate the genuineness of the prosecutor's explanation, not its reasonableness

a. Purkett v. Elem (1995) c. Amadeo v. Zant (1988) b. Avery v. Georgia (1953) d. U.S. v. Ovalle (1998)

Criminal Justice

In this case, the Court stated that as part of the bail determination judges should consider "the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against (the accused), the financial ability of the defendant to give bail and the character of the defendant."

A) United States v. Salerno B) Gerstein v. Pugh C) Stack v. Boyle D) Mapp v. Ohio

Criminal Justice

Which of the following is true of police discretion?

A. Professionals with discretionary power are immune from the temptation to abuse the authority that accompanies this power. B. Officers' discretionary decisions can never fulfill the spirit of the law if they do not follow the letter of the law. C. It allows officers to decide where to focus their energies. D. Police discretion can never lead to corruption.

Criminal Justice