Violations of antitrust law are either per se violations or rule of reason violations. What are the differences between these two types of violations? Give examples of each
A per se violation is a violation that is automatically illegal. It is irrelevant what the effect of the given conduct is on competition; the conduct, in and of itself, is illegal. Defendants are subject to both criminal and civil penalties. The Justice Department has sought criminal sanctions against per se violators. Examples would include price fixing, bid-rigging, or an agreement by competitors to divide their market among themselves.
A rule of reason violation will be illegal only if it results in harm to competition. Such violations are viewed on a case-by-case basis. Examples of rule of reason situations would include refusal to deal arrangements and reciprocal dealing agreements.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following creates a temporary difference between financial and taxable income?
a. Fines from violation of law b. Interest on municipal bonds c. Accelerated cost recovery on plant and equipment d. Premiums paid for officer's life insurance (company is beneficiary)
Given the following average direct labor table determine the rate of learning that is occurring
a.40
b.60
c.90
d.80
If the CPO at corporate headquarters has the authority for the majority of the organization's purchases, then the organization maintains a decentralized authority structure
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
When a person does not feel valued by his or her company, the person's ________ needs are most likely to be unfulfilled.
A. esteem B. social C. self-actualization D. physiological