In 2009, a member of the House introduced a bill to force a national college football playoff. The bill failed, but the push for a national football playoff system was ultimately successful. Was it appropriate for Congress to take on this issue? Present a
Present arguments from both sides.
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Take a stand for or against congressional action.
2. Arguments against: Congress had more important issues to address, for example, the economy, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the debt ceiling, unemployment, and climate change. It was not the appropriate venue to push for the change. Other types of pressure would have been sufficient.
3. Arguments for: There was widespread support for the playoff system from the public, the press, various athletic conferences, members of Congress, and the president. Where else could those in favor of the playoff turn to pressure the powers behind college football to act?
You might also like to view...
Most of the work of the attorney general involves ________ rather than ________.
A. civil law; criminal law B. criminal law; civil law C. judicial review; prosecution D. ceremonial functions; executive functions
Voter turnout is best defined as the number of __________
a. people who cast a ballot in any given election b. people registered to vote in relation to the number of actual voters c. people eligible to register and vote in relation to the number of actual voters d. actual voters in relation to the number of people eligible to register and vote
The patron-client relationship refers to interactions between colonizers and _____
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Today's social welfare policies had their start in the programs that were introduced by John F. Kennedy during the 1960s
Indicate whether the statement is true or false