In Davis v. Davis, the court held that if a divorcing couple cannot decide what to do with unused frozen pre-embryos:
A. the party wishing to use the embryos for procreation should ordinarily prevail, assuming the other party has a reasonable possibility of achieving parenthood by means other than the use of the frozen pre-embryos in question.
B. the party wishing to avoid procreation should ordinarily prevail, assuming the other party has a reasonable possibility of achieving parenthood by means other than the use of the frozen pre-embryos in question.
C. the judge should destroy the pre-embryos.
D. the dispute should be resolved in arbitration.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
What is remote CART?
What will be an ideal response?
Rebecca, a married woman, has been catapulted into the 21st century from 1785 Colonial America. She has developed a friendship with Jenny, who is divorced and the CEO of a small corporation. Jenny cohabits with a partner, Greg, and they have shared a home for three years. Rebecca is fascinated by the differences in Jenny's life, especially surrounding Jenny's divorce, her position at work, and her ownership of the house she lives in with Greg. What are some of those changes she is most apt to note? Provide five questions that would help her to understand this new world.
What will be an ideal response?
An appeal filedby the appelleeis calleda/an .
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The privilege against self-incrimination is specifically aimed at self-testimony in cases.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).