Discuss the arguments used to encourage media censorship as well as the anticensorship view. Do you agree or disagree with censorship concerning terrorism? Explain
What will be an ideal response?
• The first was national security, a powerful excuse used in times of emergency.
• According to this position, information must be controlled to ensure the survival of the state.
• Another position was to claim that the public wanted the information withheld.
• According to this logic, America was fighting a new type of war and some form of censorship was required.
• The other arguments asked Americans to behave patriotically.
• Ultimately, governmental officials claimed they were asking for restraints, not censorship.
• Mainly journalists presented the anticensorship view.
• They cited a variety of governmental mistakes and misdeeds all hidden under the rubric of national security.
• They also argued that the terrorism was essentially a war of information.
• Instead of trying to silence sources, the government should focus efforts on getting out the facts.
• Every governmental clampdown casts officials in a bad light.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following argues that punishment should fit the crime?
a. lex talionis b. mens rea c. actus reus d. stare decisis
How can a defendant challenge a conviction?
What will be an ideal response?
Before an accused can be permitted to waive counsel and represent himself or herself, which of the following constitutional requirements must be met?
a. Awareness of the right to counsel b. Express waiver c. Competency of the accused d. All of the answers are correct.
In Menechino v. Oswald, the Supreme Court ruled that due process was not an issue in parole because parole was a privilege and not a guaranteed right
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false