Based on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Berkemer v. McCarty, Vito Bernstein’s statements to police on the side of the road:
a. Are inadmissible in court because he was not read his Miranda rights.
b. Are grounds for excluding all evidence seized from the “big rig” based on a 4th Amendment violation.
c. Are relevant only as to arrests related to prostitution.
d. Are admissible in court because this was not a “custodial interrogation.”
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
What is a denial-of-service attack? How do these attacks work?
What will be an ideal response?
What are the constitutional qualifications for presidential eligibility?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following has on balance reduced the discriminatory treatment of female status offenders?
A) Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act B) Civil Rights Bill of 1964 C) Omnibus Crime Bill of 1968 D) Family Leave Act of 1993
Identify the error in the following sentence. The homeowner (A) stated that he was (B) fearful of his neighbor (C) because (D) they had argued in the past
a. A b. B c. C d. D e. No error