Does this new approach to testing toxins seem adequate to you?
What will be an ideal response?
Does the computer
simulation approach seem like the best way to determine which chemicals will be toxic to
humans? Is the testing on animals more promising? How should the risk to animals be
balanced against the risk to humans in this testing? Use ethical reasoning to develop
your answers.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is not required in order for a categorical syllogism to be in standard form?
A. The premises and the conclusion are true. B. The first premise contains the major term. C. The second premise contains the minor term. D. The conclusion is stated last.
You are considering a job in which you would promote and sell a new brand of beer. Which questions can help you determine if that goal is ethically sound?
a. Do I think drinking beer is a positive activity? b. Does this beer company engage in illegal practices? c. Am I taking this job for money, despite concerns about the product? d. Do I think this beer is unhealthy?
Which of the following best describes an argument in the context of critical thinking?
A. the process of defending a deeply held belief without considering opposing evidence B. attempting to provide rational support for a claim with a set of premises C. two people angrily disagreeing with one another over an important issue and calling each other nasty names D. None of these answers is correct.
An important function of kachinas in Hopi society was to
a. entertain the tribal members at important feasts. b. enact creation stories. c. summon the gods. d. teach the children discipline and social ethics.