Consider this argument: If I'm tall, then I'm a good basketball player I'm not a good basketball player So, I'm not tall Is this argument deductively valid? Does it have any of the deductively valid forms given in the text?
A. The argument is not deductively valid
B. The argument is deductively valid, but it doesn't any of the deductively valid forms given in the text
C. The argument is deductively valid, and has the form of modus ponens
D. The argument is deductively valid, and has the form of modus tollens
Answer: D. The argument is deductively valid, and has the form of modus tollens
You might also like to view...
According to Kant, a person's standing in the moral universe is determined by his or her
A. capability to use reason. B. social status. C. age. D. time of birth.
Feminist ethics and act utilitarianism are both examples of deontological ethics
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Explain what theory emerges once we reject Rand's theory that there are no conflicts of interest. A. If we reject the idea that there are no conflicts of interest, we see that thereis a duty to act in one's self-interest, and we recognize altruism andselfishness both as positive virtues
B. If we reject the idea that there are no conflicts of interest, we see that thereis a duty to help those in need, and we recognize altruism as a virtue tocombat selfishness. C. If we reject the idea that there are no conflicts of interest, we see that thereis a duty to help those in need, and we recognize selfishness is a virtue in and of itself. D. If we reject the idea that there are no conflicts of interest, we see that there is an absolute duty to give one's time and money if one has the talent and the wealth, and we recognize altruism as a somewhat unnecessary virtue.
How did Amos understand Yahweh's supernatural position in the universe?
A. regional deity B. national deity C. supra-national deity D. cosmic deity