Discuss why Daniel Byman states that Israel's future security depends on the future of a particular terrorist organization. What is this organization and why does Byman make this argument? Do you agree or disagree with his argument. Explain

Question

What will be an ideal response?

Answer 1

• To date, Hamas' legitimacy has not been recognized and Israel has responded to its rule in Gaza with military force and a controversial blockade that has the support of Egypt; this according to Byman is ineffective.
• Middle East peace talks can begin without Hamas, but they will not be successful if it remains on the sidelines.
• The international community needs to engage Hamas where it is possible and exploit its weaknesses and vulnerabilities when it will not be engaged.
• Hamas's rhetoric is radical and uncompromising, but its political activities are more pragmatic.
• Military force has not undermined Hamas because it allowed the group to undermine its political rivals.
• Byman believes that if Hamas is given an opportunity to achieve some type of favorable outcome for Gaza, it might be willing to create a more stable relationship with Israel.
• Such an approach is risky as it might alienate moderates who feel that Israel is rewarding violence or allow Hamas to build its future military capacity.
• Refusing to deal with it will not enhance regional peace.
• Since future homeland security depends on a stable Middle East, Byman' approach seems to suggest that the United States should take a more pragmatic approach to Hamas and encourage its allies, including Israel, to follow the same path.