Explain the reasons why it is important to consider the relevance of scientific evidence before allowing it to be introduced into a criminal case
What will be an ideal response?
It is important to consider the relevance of scientific evidence before allowing it to be introduced into a criminal case because physical evidence is accorded great weight during jury deliberations. In addition, failure to take proper safeguards when determining the relevance of evidence may unfairly prejudice a case against the accused. This is in direct conflict with the prosecution's need to be objective and present information in an objective manner at trial.
You might also like to view...
Over 100 million Chinese were followers of Falun Gong. Discuss how this movement may in the future change the Chinese approach to religion in the country
What will be an ideal response?
The 19th century British criminologist who popularized deterrence theory was __________.
A. August Comte B. John Stuart Mill C. Isaac Newton D. Jeremy Bentham
According to Hirschi and Gottfredson, white-collar crimes provide relatively _______ rewards
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
How are unknown or questioned samples and known samples alike or different?
What will be an ideal response?