Identify, define, and explain the twoprongs of the U.S. Supreme Court's test of "effective" counsel adopted in Strickland v. Washington
What will be an ideal response?
In Strickland v. Washington, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a two-prong test to
decide whether counsel has provided effective assistance in a criminal case. Under
the first prong, called the reasonableness prong, defendants have to prove that their
lawyer's performance wasn't reasonably competent, meaning that the lawyer was so
deficient that he/she "was not functioning as the ‘counsel' guaranteed the defendant
by the Sixth Amendment.". The lawyer's performance is judged by looking at the
totality of facts and circumstances surrounding the trial and the lawyer's performance.
If a defendant proves a lawyer's performance was unreasonable, the defendant must
still meet a second-prong, called the prejudice prong. Under the prejudice prong,
defendants have to prove that their lawyers' competence was probably responsible
for their conviction.
You might also like to view...
Up to the 1940s, police commonly used the "________ ________" to beat confessions out of suspects
Fill in the blank with correct word.
The patrol function is often called the ____________of policing and is the primary line element
a. non-essential element b. departmental optional division c. sole function d. backbone e. None of the above
Shift work has decreased since the invention of the electric light bulb.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
For general, routine pre-employment screening of non-law enforcement job applicants, which of the following is not appropriate?
a. Personnel Assessment Form b. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory c. Employee Screening Questionnaire d. Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey