Describe why the different driving rules in the U.S. and the U.K. do not provide an example of moral relativism.
A. The driving rules in the U.S. and U.K. are not an example of moral relativismbecause there is too much moral disagreement about whether driving on theleft or right side of the road is safer
B. The driving rules in the U.S. and U.K. are not an example of moral relativismbecause the U.K. will not budge from their position that driving on the leftside of the road is correct.
C. The driving rules in the U.S. and the U.K. are not an example of moralrelativism because there is little, if any, moral disagreement about the
purpose and practice of the rules.
D. The driving rules in the U.S. and U.K. are not an example of moral relativism
because there is too much moral disagreement about the purpose and
practice of the rules.
C
You might also like to view...
The word environment comes from an Old French word meaning
A) Nature. B) Earth. C) Turning around in. D) A small boat.
According to the author:
A. there is a philosophical component to virtually everything we do. B. philosophy is primarily conceptual analysis. C. philosophy is a sort of science that can be carried on without the use of precise instruments. D. philosophy is really a "handmaiden" of hard science. E. science is just philosophy being carried out by other means.
McGinn thinks that having the ability to read does not matter, as long as one is able to make good moral judgments
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.Marcuse tells us that, in order to encourage people to struggle to free themselves from surplus repression, we must:
A. falsely promise them a release from necessary repression. B. make them see the difference between the necessary repression they must endure, and the surplus repression from which they can be liberated. C. first free them from necessary repression. D. gain the support of the ruling class. E. None of the above