In this modern-day world with exit exams and other high-stakes tests, is it better to use Tyler's approach to curriculum evaluation or that of Stufflebeam? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
Ans: Because of high-stakes tests related to specific objectives and standards, the Tyler approach may be better. A criticism of the approach made by Stufflebeam supporters of the Tyler rationale is it hampered creativity because it was so tied to standards, which is what you need for high-stakes testing.
You might also like to view...
It is the adult, the setting, and the child that determine whether the behavior is challenging or not
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In the list of key aspects of Web 2.0, which of the following does not apply?
A. Data and software are continuously and seamlessly updated, often rapidly B. User interfaces are rich and interactive C. User interfaces are simple and interactive D. There is an “architecture of participation”
The credibility of the sender has no effect on how people receive a message
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Of the following, the one that problem solving experts would consider to be most important would be:
a. helping learners develop meta-attention strategies. b. providing direct instruction with appropriate rules for solving problems. c. identifying and defining a wide variety of problems. d. drill and practice using appropriate rules for solving problems.