What are the shortcomings of the social structure approach to understanding and preventing crime? Can these shortcomings be overcome?
What will be an ideal response?
The social structure approach suffers from several problems. One is that empirical studies regularly find weak or nonexistent correlations between socioeconomic status and self-reported delinquency. In addition, the approach emphasizes environments as the powerful causes of criminality and essentially ignores the role of other possible causative factors (e.g., biological or psychological). Finally, social structure theories are unable to predict which individuals, or even what proportion of a given population, will turn to criminal behavior. Many of these shortcomings may be able to be overcome if researchers are willing to move past preconceived biases and merge the social structural approach with positivistic trait theories that consider other causes of crime and place more emphasis on predictions of individual risk.
You might also like to view...
Miranda does not apply to the actions of private citizens, including store clerks and private security officers
a. True b. False
What is discovery? To what extent is discovery helpful? To what extent is it a hindrance?
What will be an ideal response?
When did the Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) start archiving data?
A. 1960 B. 1976 C. 1982 D. 1994
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defines a(n) ________ as "an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a con?ned and populated area
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word