Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory challenges during voir dire.
What will be an ideal response?
A challenge for cause is a voir dire challenge for which an attorney states a reason why a prospective juror should not be included on the jury.A peremptory challenge is a voir dire challenge to exclude potential jurors from serving on the jury without any supporting reason or cause.?
You might also like to view...
Contrary to common belief, anyone can become a Muslim, regardless of gender, race, nationality, color, or social or economic status
All that is required is recitation of the Shahadah (the declaration of faith containing the basic creed of Islam), witnessing that: a. "there are many deities, but Allah is he who is most supreme" b. "there is only one prophet, Muhammad" c. "there is no deity but Allah, and Muhammad is His Messenger" d. None of the above
Both in Box 8.1 and at the end of this chapter, the authors discuss examples of how Kant's and Mill's schools of thought conflict with each other. Discuss examples of police details that illustrate how officers using the two perspectives might react differently and take different action in an effort to behave ethically in the performance of their duties.
What will be an ideal response?
Don and Larry are having a beer in Vic's Bar and Grill. The two get into a disagreement and Don pushes Larry. Larry responds by punching Don in the nose. A full-blown fight erupts
In the course of the fight they break several tables and chairs valued at $600. The police arrive as the fight is ending. Neither Don nor Larry wishes to press charges against the other. However, the police officer would be correct in charging the two with: A) disrupting a public meeting. B) disorderly conduct. C) riot. D) obstructing a passageway.
Given the hypothetical table below, which age group has the highest rate of committing violent crimes?
a. 18–24
b. 25–34
c. 35–49
d. 50–64