Why is the fossil record of marine life more complete than living organism in terrestrial ecosystems?
A. Marine habitats are places that
sedimentation, rather than erosion, will take
place.
B. Organisms that live in marine
environments don't have bones or other hard
body parts.
C. Organisms that live in terrestrial habitats
are evolutionarily too old to fossilize.
D. Fossilization cannot occur without water
acting to preserve body part from
decomposition.
A
You might also like to view...
Members of the genus Actinomyces are either facultative or strict anaerobes that require ________ for optimal growth.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Which of the following is not related to the five fundamental characteristics of life?
A) A bacterial cell divides to produce two cells B) Sugars are transported on carrier proteins into cells across the plasma membrane C) Sugars are broken down inside cells to produce energy D) The gene that specifies skin color in frogs is expressed during its development from a tad pole into an adult frog E) Giraffes have longer necks so that they can reach food sources unavailable to other animals
Glycolysis is a metabolic process that is done by all cells. However, not all cells make use of another metabolic process called the Krebs cycle. What does this tell you about the evolution of these processes?
A. As a metabolic process, glycolysis likely evolved prior to the Krebs cycle B. As a metabolic process, the Krebs cycle likely evolved prior to glycolysis C. Both the Krebs cycle and glycolysis likely evolved at the same time Clarify Question What is the key concept addressed by the question? What type of thinking is required? Gather Content What do you already know about evolution and time? What other information is related to the question? Choose Answer Do you have all necessary information to determine the relative importance of glycolysis and the Kreb’s cycle? Reflect on Process Did your problem-solving process lead you to the correct answer? If not, where did the process break down or lead you astray? How can you revise your approach to produce a more desirable result?
What are the problems associated with dumping radioactive waste in subduction zones of the deep sea?
What will be an ideal response?