A certain process for manufacturing integrated circuits has been in use for a period of time, and it is known that 12% of the circuits it produces are defective. A new process that is supposed to reduce the proportion of defectives is being tested. In a simple random sample of 100 circuits produced by the new process, 12 were defective.
a. One of the engineers suggests that the test proves that the new process is no better than the old process, since the proportion of defectives in the sample is the same. Is this conclusion justified? Explain.
b. Assume that there had been only 11 defective circuits in the sample of 100. Would this have proven that the new process is better? Explain.
c. Which outcome represents stronger evidence that the new process is better: finding 11 defective circuits in the sample, or finding 2 defective circuits in the sample?
(a) No. What is important is the population proportion of defectives; the sample proportion is only an approximation. The population proportion for the new process may in fact be greater or less than that of the old process.
(b) No. The population proportion for the new process may be 0.12 or more, even though the sample proportion was only 0.11.
(c) Finding 2 defective circuits in the sample.
You might also like to view...
In split phase motors, the centrifugal switch is operated by springloaded ____________________.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The inward or outward tilt of the tire at the top is called the ____________________ alignment angle.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Aggressive Kentucky bluegrass cultivars have vigorous stolons
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Why must the three-phase instruments be connected correctly in the secondary circuits?
What will be an ideal response?