The Ontological argument defines God as "that which nothing greater can be conceived."
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
T
You might also like to view...
Are these arguments valid?
If time travel is possible, we would now have lots of time-travel visitors from the future. But we have no such visitors. So time travel is not possible. Jen is either in San Diego or in Tokyo. Since she is not in Tokyo, she is in San Diego. Some people are nice. Some people are rich. So some people are rich and nice.
According to Hobbes, if I'm robbed at gunpoint:
A. I act freely when I give up my wallet. B. my fear of death prevents my acting freely. C. my duty to preserve my life makes my actions necessary, not free. D. my actions are physically determined, and thus not free. E. the robber's actions are physically determined, and thus he is not morally responsible for them.
Syllogism 1I Given the following syllogism: No unpopular monarchs are autocrats with vision, so some autocrats without vision are not insane leaders, for some sane leaders are popular monarchs. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 1I, the conclusion is:
A) Some sane leaders are not autocrats with vision. B) All popular monarchs are autocrats with vision. C) Some autocrats with vision are not sane leaders. D) All autocrats with vision are popular monarchs. E) Some sane leaders are popular monarchs.
What does the word sikh mean?
a. prophet b. saint c. godlike d. disciple