Explain the difference between burglary and trespassing. Is there a situation where one could commit burglary without trespassing? If so, give an example. Is there a situation where one could commit trespassing without burglary? If so, give an example.
What will be an ideal response?
The difference between burglary and criminal trespass is that burglary requires the intent to commit a crime, while trespassing does not. All entry during burglary is trespassory, so there cannot be a situation where one could commit burglary without trespassing. Trespassing, however, is possible without burglary. For instance, a protester may unlawfully enter the property of a company and merely sit down in protest without the intent to commit a felony.
You might also like to view...
What ethical theory looks toward the future in assessing the impact of alternate sentences of the future conduct of the offender and also within general society (i.e. deterrence)?
a. Formalism b. Virtue ethics c. Utilitarianism d. None of the above
Many of the initial agencies who became involved in child abuse were subdivisions of which agency:
a. Stop Child Abuse Now b. Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse c. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals d. None of the above
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act made it a crime to:
A) ?plant slag code into a computer system. B) ?steal or attempt to steal someone's identity via the Internet. C) ?access computer systems without authorization. D) ?circumvent the antipiracy safeguards in most commercial software.
The Supreme Court case Coolidge v. New Hampshire declared that "inadvertency" is not a requirement for a valid plain view seizure
a. True b. False