How is a meet and confer conference in a case involving electronically stored information different from one involving only paper documents? What additional safeguards and expertise may be necessary with ESI?
What will be an ideal response?
Prior to the meet and confer, the attorney should have conferences with both the client and an IT professional to determine the sources of ESI and how they might be produced. This is necessary to ensure that the attorney does not promise the other party more than the client can deliver. It may also be necessary to have an IT professional at the meet and confer meeting to explain any issues with the ESI.
You might also like to view...
?a. sale b. firm offer c. buyer d. requirements contract e. goods f. output contract g. Uniform Commercial Code h. lease i. seller j. procedural unconscionability ?Person who provides a product or good.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The price that can be obtained for property by a willing buyer and willing seller is called:
A. basis. B. fair market value. C. adjusted basis. D. appreciation.
The U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a lower court's application of California law, which resulted in the invalidation of a provision of an arbitration agreement, because it conflicted with the federal objective of encouraging speedy and efficient arbitration in:
A) Preston v. Ferrer. B) Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. C) Crosby v. National Trade Council. D) AT&T v. Concepcion.
A defense to the crime of conspiracy is?
A. ?consent. B. intoxication.? C. ?renunciation of criminal purpose. D. ?the crime was unsuccessful.