In Certified Fire Protection v. Precision Construction, Precision accepted a winning bid from Certified for it to install a fire suppression sprinkler system. Later the two parties got into a fight over some details in the contract, which was never signed. The courts held that the contract was:
a. properly accepted, so there was a binding contract
b. accepted with minor modifications that were not critical to the intent of the contract, so it was binding
c. never formed because the Statute of Limitations had been violated due to the fact that it would take more than a year to complete
d. never formed because Certified was not licensed by the state to do such work
e. none of the other choices
e
You might also like to view...
What are the two major sources of power based on position in traditional organizational hierarchies?
What will be an ideal response?
Compare and contrast the four types of buying decision behavior exhibited by consumers
What will be an ideal response?
A transfer of contract duties to a third party is an assignment
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The white papers offered by Hootsuite are free and can be downloaded by a customer without disclosing any identity information.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)