Discuss the Good Samaritan laws in comparison with the Bad Samaritan laws. What relevance do these laws play in the crime of omission or neglect? What must be proven to file charges in these situations?
What will be an ideal response?
Good Samaritan and Bad Samaritan laws and how they apply, the crime of omission and neglect, proof of culpable mental state.
Objective:
Objective 3.1 Introduction to Offense Types
• Explain the difference between conduct and result crimes.
Objective 3.2: The Core Elements of Criminal Liability
• Explain actus reus and what constitutes a criminal act.
Objective 3.3: The Core Elements of Criminal Liability Part 2: Mens Rea and Concurrence
• Explain mens rea and the different types of intent.
• Distinguish between mens rea and motive.
• Identify strict liability offenses.
Objective 3.4: Other Elements of Criminal Liability
• Summarize concurrence.
• Explain causation.
• Identify a situation in which a circumstantial element is an element of criminal liability.
Objective 3.5: Ignorance and Mistake
• Distinguish between Ignorance of the law and Mistake.
You might also like to view...
Wright and Decker found that most armed robberies are motivated by a pressing need for ______.
A. excitement B. power C. cash D. control
Albert Ellis (1989) claims that the great religious leaders of the past were ______.
a. pioneers of the medical model b. mentally ill individuals c. cognitive-behavioral therapists d. opponents of incarceration
Explain the Communities That Care (CTC) program.
What will be an ideal response?
Name and explain at least two measures of security and custody used in a prison system
What will be an ideal response?