In Fernandez v. California (2014), the U.S. Supreme Court held that if a person refuses consent to search at one point in time, but police later ask another person at the location for consent to search while the first person is gone, then:
a. The original refusal is still effective
b. The second person does not have actual authority to consent
c. The police must return with a warrant
d. The second person’s consent is valid, if provided intelligently and voluntarily
Answer: d. The second person’s consent is valid, if provided intelligently and voluntarily
You might also like to view...
The Crime _____________ Rights Act establishes statutory rights for victims of federal crimes and gives them the necessary legal authority to assert those rights in federal court. The act grants the following rights to victims of federal crimes
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Identify and explain eight auxiliary services and facilities and their challenges to institutional security.
What will be an ideal response?
The Supreme Court, in _________, ruled that before probation can be revoked, a two-stage hearing must be held.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Choosing your research methodology is a segment of which of the following steps in the scientific process?
a. theory b. observations c. research design d. hypotheses