In Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace, the employer told the employees that as a condition of continued employment they had to agree to a new dispute resolution policy that would take effect in two weeks. Caley sued, contending the new policy was not backed by consideration, so there was no enforceable contract. The appeals court held that:
a. the employees would have to be given something extra beyond the same employment conditions for there to be consideration for a contract
b. continued employment was consideration; there was a contract c. there was no contract because the parties never bargained
d. in employment relationships there are no contracts, so consideration is irrelevant e. none of the other choices
b
You might also like to view...
For some positive value of Z, the probability that a standard normal variable is between 0 and Z is 0.3554. The value of Z is:
A) 0.31. B) 0.36. C) 0.95. D) 1.06.
Explain why a bottleneck limits system output
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following is not an issue in the collection of data for cost estimation?
A. Mismatched time periods. B. Missing data. C. Outliers. D. Inflation. E. All of the answers are issues in data collection.
If a decision of an administrative agency conflicts with a statute enacted by a higher legislative body, the agency decision will prevail
Indicate whether the statement is true or false