Match each term with its definition.
A. a federal law that permits representation in administrative hearings by someone other than an attorney, without committing UPL
B. a body that may sanction attorneys for violating ethics rules
C. a possible conflict of interest created by legal professionals switching jobs finding that their new employer represents the opponent in a former case
D. independent contractors who can work for a number of different attorneys as-needed
E. clients purchase services on a task-by-task basis
F. based upon an evidentiary principle, it protects certain client communications from being revealed in court
G. the amount of time expended on a particular case that can be the basis for compensation by the client
H. supervising attorney responsible for the negligence and other torts committed by her employees
I. when a paralegal is prohibited from involvement in a case due to the possibility of a conflict of interest
J. law firm or representative actively seeks people in need of representation without a prior relationship
A. Administrative Procedure Act
B. Disciplinary board
C. Former client-current opponent
D. Freelance paralegal
E. Discrete tasks representation
F. Attorney-client privilege
G. Billable hours
H. Vicarious liability
I. Ethical wall
J. Solicitation
You might also like to view...
The Supreme Court placed restrictions on the censorship of inmate mail in:
a. Prewitt v. State of Arizona ex rel. Eyman (1969). b. Procunier v. Martinez (1974). c. City of Ladue v. Gilleo (1994). d. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997).
According to feminist criminology, one general problem criminology traditionally and largely framed by male criminologists and focusing on male offenders
Feminist criminology calls attention to traditional criminology not able to adequately account for female crime and term this a ___________ issue. Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
In 2006, parole officers had an average caseload of ______.
A. 15 B. 38 C. 56 D. 61
intention torts
What will be an ideal response?