What did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District find in the 1970 case of Menechino v. Oswald?
a. A parole proceeding is nonadversarial in nature because both parties, the board and the inmate, have the same concern—rehabilitation.
b. Parole release hearings are not fact-finding determinations because the board makes a determination based on numerous tangible and intangible factors.
c. The inmate has "no present private interest" to be protected (he has no liberty interest).
d. all of the above
d
You might also like to view...
Italy had a problem with which terrorist group during the 1970s?
What will be an ideal response?
The sign test is limited to persons used as their own controls in before-after experiments
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Which of the following is NOT an example of an early warning system?
a. a supervisor speaking with an officer after several out-of-character outbursts toward citizens by the officer while on duty b. a police chief allowing an officer to take personal leave while dealing with family issues c. a colleague observing a fellow officer using excessive physical force on a number of citizens in different instances and not saying something d. a group of officers taking notice when a fellow officer begins to drink too much
______ are underpaid in relation to other law enforcement officers.
a. County correctional officers b. State appointed lawyers c. State police troopers d. County sheriff’s deputies