In what five ways are the intellectual abilities of adolescents superior to those of children? Explain and give a concrete illustration of each developmental trend.

What will be an ideal response?


There are five chief ways in which the thinking of adolescents is more advanced, more efficient, and more effective than that of children. First, during adolescence individuals become better able to think about what is possible, instead of limiting their thought to what is real or directly observable. Second, adolescents become better able to think about abstract things, rather than being limited to the concrete. Third, during adolescence individuals begin thinking more often about the process of thinking itself. Fourth, adolescents' thinking tends to become multidimensional rather than limited to a single issue. Finally, adolescents are more likely than children to see things as relative rather than absolute.

Key Points:

a) Think about what is possible.

b) Think about abstract concepts.

c) Think about thinking-metacognition.

d) Thinking is multidimensional.

e) See things as relative rather than absolute.

Psychology

You might also like to view...

Danger signals to watch out for in psychotherapy include the therapist

a. being controlling and blaming the client for not making progress. b. making verbal threats to the client. c. encouraging prolonged dependence on him or her. d. exhibiting any of these characteristics.

Psychology

According to Freud, the result of conflict between the id and the superego is __________.

A. libido B. depression C. psychosis D. anxiety

Psychology

The fundamental attribution error is the tendency to attribute

a. one's own behavior to personal factors rather than to the situation. b. one's own behavior to the situation rather than to personal factors. c. another person's behavior to personal factors rather than to the situation. d. another person's behavior to situational factors rather than to personal factors.

Psychology

Distinguish between formal and informal reasoning and understand the nature of dialectical reasoning.

What will be an ideal response?

Psychology