Meg bought an expensive one-of-a-kind signed painting by a well-known artist. Meg later discovered that the artist has some extreme political views, so Meg painted over the artist's signature on the painting. Have any copyright rights been violated? Discuss.?
What will be an ideal response?
Yes. The artist has the right of attribution (to be known as the artist of the work). This work appears to be a work of fine art. Under the Visual Artists Rights Act, authors of works of fine arts retain certain rights even after their work is sold, namely, rights of attribution and rights of integrity. Meg has violated the right of attribution/paternity by painting over the artist's signature.?
You might also like to view...
When recording time, always record the ____________________ amount of time.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
a. stipulation b. counteroffer c. offer d. option contract e. revocation f. acceptance g. mailbox rule h. rejection i. solicitation j. mirror image rule ? A new offer.?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Which of the following statements is true concerning the difference between federal and state juries?
A) Federal juries always consist of twelve members, while some state juries may be as small as six. B) Federal juries always require a unanimous verdict, while some state juries do not. C) Federal juries hear cases concerning federal law violations, while state juries hear cases of alleged state law violations. D) All of the above are true. E) None of the above are true.
A predecessor concept to a theory of recovery in negligence was trespass
Indicate whether the statement is true or false