Explain three intercultural dialectics and give examples of each

Question

Please provide the best answer for the best statement.

Answer 1

Answer: The first dialectic is cultural–individual. It emphasizes that some behaviors are determined by our culture, whereas others are simply idiosyncratic, or particular to us as individuals. Taking this dialectical approach means that one does not immediately assume that someone’s behavior is culturally based. For example, a girl twists her hair while she talks, not because she is female, or young, or Protestant, or African American, but because she chooses to. A second is the personal–contextual dialectic. This dialectic focuses on the importance of context or situation and the personal in intercultural communication. Reducing an interaction to a mere meeting of two individuals means viewing intercultural communication too simplistically. For example, a Greek and a German exchange student strike up a conversation in a gym where they are both exercising. The immediate situation has an impact, so their conversation would probably differ dramatically if it occurred at a party or at a funeral service. The larger situation, including political and historical forces, also plays a role. A third dialectic is differences–similarities. This dialectic shows that real, important differences exist between cultural groups. However, important commonalities exist as well. For example, two people may be from different countries with different cultures and backgrounds, but they could have several common interests and experiences. A fourth is static–dynamic. This dialectic shows that, although some cultural patterns remain relatively stable and static for years, they can also undergo dynamic change. For example, many books and movies portray Indians living the rural life they lived centuries ago—even though the majority of Indians in the United States today live in urban areas. A fifth dialectic is history/past–present/future. This dialectic focuses on the present and the past. For example, one cannot fully understand contemporary relations between Arabs and Jews, Muslims and Christians, or Catholics and Protestants without knowing something of their history. At the same time, people cannot ignore current events. A sixth is privilege–disadvantage. This dialectic demonstrates that, in intercultural interactions, people can be simultaneously privileged and disadvantaged. For example, although Americans may be privileged in having more money and the luxury of travel, they can also feel vulnerable in foreign countries if they are ignorant of the local languages and customs.