Why have minor parties been so unsuccessful in U.S. politics? In what electoral systems are minor parties more likely to be successful?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Indicate that minor parties are at a disadvantage in the United States because U.S. elections take place in winner-take-all systems within single-member-districts. Duverger's Law suggests that these factors favor the two-party system.
2. Note that proportional representation would allow minor parties to have some representation because legislative seats would be awarded based on a proportion of the total votes. Thus, a party finishing third or fourth would still receive some legislative seats.
You might also like to view...
The middle class includes __________.
A. unskilled workers B. bureaucrats C. political leaders D. office clerks
What is incrementalism?
a. the tendency for budgets to increase modestly from year to year b. income tax rates that increase in increments as income increases c. congressionalresolutions that prohibit spending increases except in times of emergency d. the tendency for the national debt to increase in large increments every year
Given that the state depends on the citizen in this example (R >1), to what extent does the citizen’s behavior depend on the attractiveness of her exit options?
What will be an ideal response?
Which administration witnessed U.S. interventions in Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo?
a. George H. W. Bush. b. Clinton. c. George W. Bush. d. Obama.