Some have characterized the mentality of the Scientific Revolution as one focused on how things operate in the natural world, rather than on why (the ultimate explanations that Greek and medieval scholars considered most important). Do you think this is a fair description of the change in scientific approach? Cite examples to support your opinion. How does Newton's work on gravity fit into your
discussion?
What will be an ideal response?
Ans: In the language of Greek philosophy, it may be argued that the thinkers of the Scientific Revolution were concerned with material, efficient, and formal causes while excluding final causality from their consideration. The example of gravity would fit into this description because Newton's laws explain its operation, but gravity itself is still not understood.
You might also like to view...
The most prominent symbol of the American Enlightenment on both sides of the Atlantic was ________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Which of these first spurred emigration from Portugal to Brazil?
A) sugar plantations B) establishment of the captaincies C) the Treaty of Tordesillas D) discovery of gold
Which of the following tribes controlled the southern interior?
A) Cherokee B) Creek C) Choctaw D) All of the above.
In 1786, Congress adopted ________Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).