What were the facts and holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in Katz v. U.S.? Why is this decision important?
What will be an ideal response?
The 1967 case of Katz v. United States caused the U.S. Congress to act in regards to the lack of laws pertaining to wiretapping and eavesdropping. In the Katz case, FBI agents attached an electronic listening and recording device to the outside of a public telephone booth that Katz was using to lay off Los Angeles gambling bets in Miami, Florida. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the FBI violated Katz's Fourth Amendment privacy rights and that the evidence obtained could not be used to obtain Katz's criminal gambling conviction. As a result of this court decision, in 1968 Congress enacted the Federal Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act. Most states followed by enacting similar state laws making the following changes in the laws on electronic surveillance:
- The laws authorize court orders permitting wiretapping and/or electronic surveillance by law enforcement officers in much the same manner as search warrants are issued.29
- The act makes wiretapping and electronic surveillance done in violation of the act a felony. The distribution, possession, and advertising of mechanical and electronic devices used for wiretapping and electronic surveillance are also made a felony.
You might also like to view...
The party requesting a modification must prove that there has been a substantial change in circumstances requiring a modification of the original order.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
What is the unlawful taking and carrying away of another person with the intent to deprive that person of his or her liberty?
a. Temporary restraint b. Restraint c. Kidnapping d. None of the above
The average salary of general jurisdiction trial judges is approximately:
A. $115,000. B. $140,000. C. $175,000. D. $200,000.
The intent to ensure fair sentencing by ending the reduction of terms in prison by grants of parole, ensuring that persons committing similar crimes serve similar terms, and ensuring that sentences reflect the severity of the criminal conduct is called:
a. concurrent sentences. b. determinate sentencing. c. sentencing guidelines. d. sentencing fairness.