In the two cases of Trigg and Fraser Jewelers, the Ontario Court of Appeal reached opposite decisions, upholding the limitation of liability clause in one case but not the other. What reasons did the court give that can explain this result?
A) Mr. Trigg did not have notice of the exemption clause whereas Fraser Jewelers did.
B) The burden of proof was on the defendant in the Trigg case but on the plaintiff in Fraser Jewelers.
C) In Trigg, there was a misrepresentation by the sale agent; in Fraser Jewelers, there was none.
D) In Trigg the damage was so great it would be unfair to not give him damages
E) In Fraser the damages were too remote
A
You might also like to view...
The ________ influence is the reference group influence that helps the consumer make decisions about specific brands or activities
A) normative B) comparative C) selective D) coercive
The Discount on Bonds Payable balance is subtracted from Bonds Payable on the income statement
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Brand equity can be built by ________, which create(s) equity by linking the brand to other information in memory that conveys meaning to customers
A) internal marketing B) brand transferability C) secondary associations D) customer alignment E) brand auditing
Which element below is defined as the act of transmitting thoughts, processes, and ideas through a variety of channels?
A. conveyance B. communication C. television D. motivation