The attractive nuisance doctrine relates to:
a. Children.
b. Children and parents.
c. Animals
d. Children and animals.
A
You might also like to view...
A subpoena duces tecum can be used to secure
A. evidentiary documents B. documents whose existence incriminates the person who possesses them C. incriminating testimony from a suspect D. incriminating testimony from a witness
Dawne is a paralegal working in a family law practice. Her supervisor, Attorney Rabb, is out of the office due to a medical emergency when a new client, Daniela, comes in for a previously scheduled initial appointment. Rather than cancel and inconvenience her, Dawne meets with Daniela. She asks about what kind of assistance the client is seeking and records basic facts such as contact
information. Because the client is seeking a divorce, she provides her with a copy of documents available in the office reception area such as a blank financial statement form, a blank child support guidelines worksheet, and a "Frequently Asked Questions" sheet developed by the supervising attorney. Dawne advises Daniela that the divorce will cost approximately $10,000. Which of the following statements is accurate with respect to the paralegal's conduct in this situation? A) It was unethical for Dawne to participate in an interview and she should have cancelled the appointment. B) It was unethical for Dawne to quote a fee to the client. C) It was unethical for Dawne to provide the client with copies of documents and forms available in the firm's reception area. D) It was unethical for Dawne to gather and record basic contact information about the client.
Why would any employee want to litigate a claim for injury outside theworkers’ compensation system?
A. Because the potential for recovery is much lower than that he or she wouldreceive in the workers’ compensation system. B. Because the potential amount the injured worker would receive is muchhigher than he or she would receive to the workers’ compensation system. C. Because a judge would hear the employee’s claim if it were taken outside the workers’ compensation system, but a jury would hear it if it remained within the workers’ compensation system. D. There are no reasons why an employee would wish to take a workers’ compensation claim outside of the workers’ compensation system.
If the law applied in a court opinion is different from that which applies to the client's case, the court opinion cannot be mandatory precedent.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)