Explain the issues in Wisconsin v. Mitchell?
What will be an ideal response?
In Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Wisconsin's hate crime statute, which increased penalties for crimes motivated by hate or by bias. Mitchell had challenged the constitutionality of the hate crime enhancement statute, claiming that it violated the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of expression. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the statute, stating that bias or hate crimes were valid.
You might also like to view...
Secondary analysis involves the systematic classification of the content of mass media
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A person is guilty of a criminal attempt when, with intent to commit a crime, the person engages in conduct, which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime whether or not his intention is accomplished
a. True b. False
The media often obscure the underlying causes of crime
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Which term recognizes that juveniles are influenced by social opportunities and structural constraints, and make personal choices from among the options that they believe they are facing?
A) delinquency B) antisocial behavior C) high-risk behavior D) human agency